Guantanamo Bay remains a symbol of evil

To the Editor:

“Guantanamo Bay is the anti-Statue of Liberty.” — Thomas Friedman

Last week Defense Secretary James Mattis visited troops at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Station for the holiday. This visit came after recent UN reports of torture there, but the Secretary insisted that he was only going to meet with the troops to thank them for their service. The Pentagon confirmed that Mattis would not inspect detention facilities or discuss detainee policy.

Wouldn’t the Secretary of Defense be interested in the conditions of the world’s most infamous prison? Wouldn’t any CEO of his/her organization want to know what is happening on the ground, face to face? It has been 16 years since another Secretary of Defense (Donald Rumsfeld) visited GITMO, and since then, nearly 800 prisoners have been held at the facility; 731 of these detainees were released without charges; 15 were children under age 18; and 9 have died by suicide or other causes. According to Human Rights Watch, of the 41 detainees that remain at Guantanamo only 7, Abd-al-Rahim al-Nashri, Abd al Hadi al Iraqi, and five September 11, 2001 co-defendants face any formal charges.

Again, considering the facility’s history of torture, arrests without charges, locked up juveniles, and deaths of detainees, wouldn’t Mattis want to give the place a good look through? Or does the Secretary not want to know what goes on there?

Guantanamo Bay is still one of the most effective propaganda tools in the world for militant Islamic fundamentalists. The maximum security prison, based in Cuba, was set up by the Bush administration in January 2002, apparently in response to the attacks of 9/11. But as former president Jimmy Carter has stated: “What has happened at Guantanamo Bay ... does not represent the will of the American people ... I’m embarrassed about it, I think it’s wrong. I think it does give terrorists an unwarranted excuse to use despicable means to hurt innocent people.”

President Barack Obama made this case in even stronger terms. “I believe the United States of America must remain a standard bearer in the conduct of war. That is what makes us different from those whom we fight. That is a source of our strength ... We lose ourselves when we compromise the very ideals that we fight to defend.”

Along with Carter and Obama, the vast majority of Americans know that keeping GITMO open is tactically misguided and blatantly immoral. Americans also know that it gives terrorists an opportunity to say, “Why can’t we torture? You do.” It makes our entire constitutional system of due process look ridiculous.

So why, after 16 years, have we failed to muster the moral and political courage to shut down this global symbol of evil?



Recommended for you


(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.